Murdoch Locational, Personal, and Whatnot Desires of 2015 and or 2017.

Places To Live-

Japan,France,Taiwan,

Murdoch seems to want to live in a country with a strong identity or in a country with salient idiosyncrasies or whatnot. 

Locations I Dig-

Vietnam,Cambodia,South Africa,New Zealand, Australia, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, 

Murdoch doesn't seem to be using the economic freedom index to choose locations he sighed back in 2015 and or 2017. He seems to have choose locations he had "digged" back then rather arbitrarily. 

Locations with free College-

Sweden,Slovenia,Norway,France,Finland,Germany,Brazil

In 2015 & or 2017, Murdoch seemingly had a desire to seek out freebies.

Locations to Visit-

Portland Oregon,Seattle Washington,Mount Rushmore, Jim Morrison Hotel,Celebrity Sepulchers,Canada,

Murdoch might have had a hippie artist bias for the places he wanted to visit besides that of  Mount Rushmore being more of a situational FOMO situation where he was unable to go once so thereafter he had a desire to visit Mount Rushmore. 

Issues I can Jive with-

College Debt, Shame, 

Living The Miser Life In College-

Would like to live in van & pay gym membership to save money on room & board or avoid renting a apartment and vouching to stay in the dorm instead,

College Desires-

Google Fiber, cheap, Bibliophile exposure, Film Opportunities, Photography Opportunities, Acting Opportunities, 

What I Want Out of College-

Proficient Intelligence, Writing Abilities, Opportunities for Secure Jobs, Opportunities for adventurous jobs, a meritorious vocabulary, IQ of 150, Speed Reading Abilities, Crowdsourcing Abilities, Acting Abilities, fluency in various languages, 

Read More

Found An Abstruse Asking A Female Via Call Document of Murdoch's

Asking Clare Out--Call Outline

Strengths - 

Eupathy via interpersonal conntectness or some sort of happiness via ppl humbug. 

Weaknesses - 

1. She seems gossipy about her putative friends. 

2. I had low standards then i.e. are you single .. yes ... Okay then 

Opportunities - 

1. She could read and teach me the Hunter X Hunter French Manga I have.

2. We could picnic on one of the last warm days of the season.

3. Our dates could be an investigational mission for our acting class work. 

 4. We can hang out with my female dog Onita. 

5.  We could eat Indian Food

6. She would be proficient as a Vocal Coach

7. She would be proficient as a Ballet Coach [See:The Other Guys]

8. Me me me

Threats - 

We in same class – not fun if the relationship sours. 

The Plan if I Decide to Follow Through with the asking out of female – The LLOYD Telephone Call from Say Anything Quirks

I.Whoah, what a day, huh?

II.Yeah-with a falling tone

III.Quick question

IV.Okay, um, so it's Murdoch and... uh... uh... let's go out.  Do you 

wanna go out?

V.Busy?

VI.Are you busy on Friday?

VII.Are you busy on Saturday?

VIII.So you're monumentally busy?

IX.I could give you an enormous amount of tips.  Many tips. English 

Tips. (Chinese Reading of Cat in the Hat in exchange for Hunter X Hunter French Manga reading).

X.Pardon me?

XI.You will?  Excellent, alright, this is great.  You will, really?

XII.Alright.  This is really great.  Alright, we're going out. It's a 

date.  It's a scam.  Whatever, whatever, alright, I'll pick you 

up at what, eight O' clock?

Read More

Dream Journal: How my punishment for jumping into the bay had me working with EXID. 2020/09/29

My punishment for jumping in the bay in China   was working as a backup vocalist for a rock band, which I didn't know which rock band it was going to be at the time do to my poor chinese language comprehension. Luckily the band turned out to be EXID. Another problem I had due to my poor language cability was not knowing how long I was working for. I didn't know if I was working a day eight days eight hours (which I believed to be most likely) or three hours. It ended up turning out to be an eight hours working period. I took the mic at the back of the stage where I said generic hype man expressions, such "Get ready to ROCK", etcetera. After we finished the performance, we were driven to a gondola to go up mountain. I told EXID my concerns about not being able to find the place where I was staying with the language learning school. I didn't have my phone at the time nor any documents because I jumped into the bay;and thence, these were my chief concerns aboon that of fanboyism.  EXID understood my concerns and told me they would help me find my place back. I thanked them.

Read More

Examining A Murdochian Quote on Relationships: A appeal to experimentalism in relationships.

"Considering all sorts of factors such as the divorce rates and the amounts of relationships many of us have prior to marriage. We should be lead to the understanding that statistically we're likely to be in an momentary relationship. Now given such acknowledgement of the unlikeness of matrimonial success. We should flip our super lovely-dovey relationship brain-mode to experimentalist romantic poet mode. This experimentalist romantic poet mode shall be something that will grant us a die-hard acceptance for our evanescent romances. Which in turn will grant us the ability to experiment with our romanticist acts and thus ameliorating either our current relationships and or our future relationships."

Read More

SPOILER WARNING: Murdoch did some prewriting for an essay on the juxtaposition between Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" & Sophocles' "Antigone".

The Lottery -

The character from The Lottery “Tessie” dies for the supposed greater good. She has her death justified via the repressive societies' cruel traditionalist's dogma. This story may be some sort of propagandistic material for moral rationalism or for figuring out stuff for yourself via your experiences instead of being reliant on your society for your moral & whatnot. My reasoning for such claim is that I believe Shirley Jackson opposed the draft during WWII; at a time when if you opposed such involuntary risk of death, twas social suicide; which, is sort of analogous to what happens in "The Lottery" with Tessie. Sadly, Tessie only comes to the realization that she wants to oppose her societies dogma when she was unlucky enough to be chosen for death.

Antigone -

The characters wanweird in "Antigone" comes from the consequences of the character's actions conflicting with one another. The end of this story was an negative result for all the characters in "Antigone" unlike that of the character in Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" where the negative result only really applies to her. The notable moral of this story is the idea that one may have a desire to have god’s will, top of mind aboon that of a king or a nation-state if applied to modern times. A desire to hold  pride & or power is explicitly shown by the King wanting to punish the independent-thinking lady (besides the high power influence) who buried the putative traitors body against the will of the king and for god's supposed will that was in opposition of the King's will. The lady dies, but people are actually sad about it in this one. Unlike in "The Lottery" where Tessie's loved ones help with the stoning of Tessie for the supposed heavily influenced by poppycock ""greater good"".

Read More

I found this list of media in "Murdoch Maxwell Harris's" google drive. He seems to be drawn to these pieces of media -- why?

Oldboy (2003) 

Was Murdoch's interested in neanimorphic-individuals [folks who appear younger than they actually are] ? Why was he watching this thing called "Oldboy"? Was he interested in relationships with older men?

American Beauty (1999) 

Was he an practitioner of geneclexis [one who seeks a mate based on their appearance]; whilst having a preference for Americans? He seems to have liked David Bowie's "I'm Afraid Of Americans" at around the same time. Did Murdoch have some sort of love/hate relationship with these "Americans"? 

Midnight Runners (2017)

Was Murdoch search for some sort of mesonoxian [related to midnight] courier job? 

Die Hard (1988)

Does he have some sort of suicidal idealization? Why does he like this "Die Hard"? Does he want to Die Hard? What does this hard refer to? Does it refer to something phallic?

Cowboy Bebop (1998)

Why did Murdoch have an interest in Cowboys and Bebop this "style of jazz developed in the early to mid-1940s in the United States, which features compositions characterized by a fast tempo, complex chord progressions with rapid chord changes and numerous changes of key, instrumental virtuosity" [See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bebop ]. I believe he may of had a desire to become a hyper-efficient individual. Maybe doing some cow herding, as a freelance worker, whilst searching for jazz musician gigs in all the towns he had herded cattle to.

Police Story (1985) 

Does he have a desire to become a jackboot'ian cop? Hmm, why was he interested in the fuzz?

Snatch (2000)

As a psychoanalyst, I see Murdoch had harpaxophobia [the fear of thieves or of becoming a thief]. This must have been an ever-present fear throughout his life.

Read More

I found this grammarless mortifying essay I wrote In high school about this book called "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn. (This seems to be a draft to it)

Essay Question - 

    The world was made for man, & he was meant to rule & conquer it.” Why does Ishmael find this problematic? Where does this Taker story come from? is there another story that might be helpful in healing humans' relationship with the Earth (themselves)?

The Mortifying Ishmael Probably Without A Thesis - 

    The taker story is about the development of a portion of the human race becoming speciesist and becoming more & more damaging as it achieves its accolades. These accolades such as irrigation, mass production of goods, or protections from our (as in us humans') limiting factors such as disease, extreme weather, or predation. These achievements give the takers a seemingly unfair edge where we can seemingly play like the gods. An edge where we the takers pursue theomorphism at the putative expense of the other species on the planet(s). I believe that people should assist all the species, their environment, and give succor to the folks in their shared biomass. All of this would aid their attempts to become god-like creatures especially in becoming a divine altruistic David Bowie-like god..

    There’s no possible way currently to find out if the universe was made for the peoplekind species or any other species. Because in the search of evidence for such we can point out several reasons why & not for any species. Instead we find various species working in harmony; we observe the species' limiting factors and their niches all within their ecosystems. Heck even us takers (i.e. humans) compete in the state of nature. So tis (really) best to drop the question entirely unless you desire to be a pochemuchka about it. Or if you have some weird fascistic desire to justify your species being number 1 or something. Daniel Quinn (a human/taker) attacks the thought of his species claiming the throne. Something I may refute saying that maybe we human-folk could be like sweetie-pants dictators helping all the other species get smart. In Daniel Quin's book, he posits the hypothetical of another species from our earthly biomass achieving an equal level of consciousness & intelligence that we do. I find this a lame hypothetical because we probs have to power right now; to help these other species evolve. We don't need to leave them to their own devices. To maybe see these other species evolve to our level in about a few million million years or so. We could herald their abilities & bring them to our level. But, NO apparently we need a beat down (Daniel Quin says) -- cause humans are bad. Daniel then brings up situations where we were inappropriately conducting ourselves (us takers) to the annoyance of other species. But, as I see it we're still developing. So of course we're going to muck up -- at times. That's not specifically human nature that's just straight-up nature -- everybody's a screw-up. Things muck up -- we muck up. Yes, we participate in excessive farming, or we farm in ways in which damage the soil. We humans see these negative practices/effects, we feel bad about them, & we act to fix them. Daniel Quin plays it off as though we all perceive the past as wholly detestable. Which to me is a bit maddening. Yes, I know it's true -- we have done some lame things in the past. But heck it's thanks to the past that we learn. In regards to the overproduction whatnot, I rather have tons of stuff rather than a paucity of stuffs. So I surmise most people would probably choose tons of stuffs. I mean it’s only natural, for people to seek luxuries -- luxuries are quite luxurious.

    In relating to, conquering the world. I’d say as of now it is our niche. It's the human thing to do. Many of us like Schumpeter's gale & welcome change. The world isn't perfect and we recognize that. We will surely work to maintain the biomass' homeostasis because us selfish takers have of own homeostasis-es tied to such health of the biomass'/environment's homeostasis. Yes, our humanly interventions may not sustain itself forever, as shown in Ishmael, but, if our interventions are continuous & are ever-adapting, the biomass will be sustained as long as we assist or if we had set in motion an automotive system that does such for us. 

    Ishmael finds this problematic because he finds that nothing humanity has done in the past has been successful for the earth as a whole & if humanity would continue their efforts it would be insane. But, hey I don’t find ourselves being in this perpetual state of adolescence. I don’t believe we're following the path of insanity expecting a different result from the same experiment. I believe we are adapting like the evolution does with all the species on our planet. Just in a different way. Instead of the traditional mutations in DNA. Were evolving through an explosion of ideas & connect-ted-ness. See our internet, the waning powers of nation-states, and the large gatherings of people apart of what-have-you avowed interests. Our species becoming a melting pot for awesome multiculturalism & not just some human-centric niche loving species. We humans now have biocentrists, cynocentrists [doggys first folk], ecocentrists, and yes we still have a few anthropocentrists. Even if our excess production temporarily affects the environment. We will learn how to fix the environment. We people love all the niches, all the cultures, and mega-nerds. When we become aware of the issue we attempt to solve it. Because that's how we do.

    The taker story comes from the assumption that a portion of humanity is significantly separated from another. That’s simply not true. We simply may have different motives. But, heck we're always are supporting one another as we support the other animals as they often help us. Albeit I do concede that a lot of the other animals haven't developed their brains much. Like the Hippos, but if we could genetically engineer the hippos to be (really) smart. So they wouldn't have to be such liability smashing into Walmarts and whatnot.

Read More