If you're a bystander who is put in danger by a terrorist and the terrorist happens to be the only person who's able to save you from the danger they themselves put you in – Murdochian teachings say you should except their help. If then the terrorist claims you to be an accomplice for accepting help and gives you a vague/clear impression that they will kill you if you go to the police. Murdochians wouldn't go to the police, but Murdochians would attempt to infiltrate their operation whilst leaving a coded missive for the authorities later on to view in your residence. Murdochians would work with the terrorists and then make the terrorist's operation super obvious and in so doing make the terrorist get caught. Then to prove your innocence /and to prove that you were only only feigning to help the terrorists, Murdochians would use the missive you had written for the authorities before to prove your intentions. Not only should this be a prewritten message it should also be an electronic prerecorded message that would be set to be live streamed at a particular time when you decide or are unable to prevent it from automatically beginning sent out. Hopefully this livestream would in some way circumnavigate possible bureaucratic attitudes and lack of particularism in regard to how the law is applied.
Murdochians would only use this strategy only if the terrorists seem particularly competent and a threat is particularly redoubtable – and if the authorities are certainly not an option that would ensure your survival [See: corrupted authorities, authorities with a paucity of competency, and excessively talented terrorists].
You could ignore preserving your life if perhaps your psychological altruism really shines through and you're willing to sacrifice yourself for the greater good – to which I say – "Good on ya" – but the Murdochian way would be to stick with a psychological egoism tactic for this situation. Ensuring your own survival whilst also thwarting anymore terrorist stuffs.
0 comments:
Post a Comment